Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:07:20 EDT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 11/03/2009 22:01:18 GMT Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
<<My question, which I address to all is:
Wouldn’t a simple plan of selecting from your best performers, automatically
be selecting colonies that cope best with the ‘environmental factors’ as
defined by Phillips 1918, which include mites as such. In other words, let
the colonies dictate which traits are essential for them to cope with the
environmental factors, if hygenic behavior takes a second seat to grooming
behavior, so be it?>>
If you treat for mites, then any resistance will inevitably be masked. If
you want to look for mite resistance per se, rather than a specific behaviour,
the way to go might be to count mites when you treat, and breed from the
colonies with least. Obviously, thee are other variables which could affect
results. Treating every two years might make the diffeences more obvious.
Regards,
Robert Brenchley
Birmingham UK
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|