Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:29:00 -0500 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:32:57 -0500, Bill T <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Phytoestrogens, the substance noted, are found in nature and the phyto
>specifically relates to plants.
Right, but the implication is that if phytoestrogens can cause radical
changes in organisms, then we should be doubly on guard against man-made
estrogen pollution. Which we knew already, but this outlines some of the
effects.
The study demonstrates that individuals subjected to a high consumption of
certain substances show altered characters, which are relevant from an
evolutionary perspective, such as epigenetic and morphometric characters or
sexual maturation as a life history character.
"Consumption of compounds *such as* phytoestrogens by pregnant mothers may
interfere with the establishment of DNA methylation in the developing
embryos, leading to a change in DNA methylation and potential gene
expression patterns in the resulting adults."
What we are talking about is a direct environmental effect on heredity and
evolution, as opposed to the indirect effect produced by natural selection.
It means at least two things: 1) organisms can be beneficially altered
without recourse to actual breeding programs, and 2) organisms can be
negatively affected by the environment and pass these effects on to their
offspring.
pb
*******************************************************
* Search the BEE-L archives at: *
* http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l *
*******************************************************
|
|
|