Buckley was exactly what I was thinking!

Here's a link for Diagnostic Aritfacts of Maryland with a variety of images
of Buckley...hope that helps!

http://www.jefpat.org/diagnostic/Historic_Ceramic_Web_Page/Historic%20Ware%20Descriptions/Buckley.HTM

Kelly Cooper
Lab Director
Archaeological Testing and Consulting, Inc.
12025 Remington Drive
Silver Spring, MD 20902
(301) 593-4192

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Carl Steen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  Could it be Buckleyware? This would have a good amount of white clay in
> the paste though.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Brothers <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 7:53 am
> Subject: Re: Pottery Type
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Darn my fingers, agatized (banded like agate). Sort of a tiger stripe.
> Black-glazed redware works, for some reason I overlooked that one.?
> ?
>
> On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Patrick Tucker wrote:?
> ?
>
> > Not sure what you mean by "agitated," but it sounds somewhat like?
>
> > black-glazed redware. This is the archaeological category for the > type,
> not?
>
> > the decorative type listed in pottery manufacturers' records. I have >
> not?
>
> > seen this category in temporal contexts later than the 1830s.?
>
> >?
>
> > Regards,?
>
> >?
>
> > Pat Tucker?
>
> >?
>
> > -----Original Message-----?
>
> > From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of >
> James?
>
> > Brothers?
>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:10 PM?
>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
>
> > Subject: Pottery Type?
>
> >?
>
> > I have a pottery fragment from Virginia (late 1700s to end of 19C?
>
> > context). Earthenware, dark red paste. Glaze on one side is lustrous,?
>
> > other side is black and dark brown agitated. I'm pulling a blank, any?
>
> > suggestions??
>
> > Thanks?
>
> > Jim Brothers?
>
>
>
>
>