BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Sharp <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:26:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Hi, I was wondering if it isn't time to step back and rethink this whole neonic issue.
 
Wasn't that just one idea that people came up with to explain CCD and now have realized that it is without merit?  Why are beekeepers still carrying on about it?
I understand that early neonics were quite toxic to bees, but that much progress has been made in that regard (i.e. Assail and Calypso).
 
Bill Sharp

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2