HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Linda Derry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:39:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
Lyle,

About Multi-flora rose:  I think most of these may have come in the late
19th century, and  the variety Rosa multifora platyhylla was actually in the
SE in the early 19th century  (commonly known as "Seven sisters).  

And is still in the woods around old house sites, at least where I am in
Alabama. 


Linda Derry


-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lyle E.
Browning
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 12:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Vegetation and Historic Sites

I think the list is probably the best long-term item coming out of this
discussion. Perhaps when done, it might be posted to the NPS website or some
other "permanent" location for down load?

Also, I don't know if anyone has mentioned them, but ailanthus altissima
(Tree of Heaven at one end; Ghetto Palm at the other of the naming spectrum)
is a common house indicator, although birds spread them to places where
houses were never located. There is also another fast growing, soft wood
Chinese "weed wood" with very large (20cm) multi-lobed leaves that I've
never seen outside an urban environment in VA.

Also, while not exactly on point for house sites, intentionally introduced
invasives such as Johnson Grass for cattle fodder can help demarcate old
fields, Kudzu for same although that stuff will eventually cover the planet,
and multi-flora rose all date to the 20th century for introduction. Thinking
ahead a bit, bio-sampling will undoubtedly have bug parts so Japanese
Beetles may be in the sample, thus post-dating 1939 if memory serves.

Finally, there's a website that has a rather extensive list of invasive
plants at:  http://www.invasive.org/weedcd/

Lyle Browning


On Mar 26, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Brad Laffitte wrote:

> Thanks to everyone for the overwhelming response and discussion.
>  
> The whole purpose of posing this question to the group revolves around
what seems to be a lack of literature on the subject.  We all seem to have
experiences and knowledge with vegetation signatures and historic sites, but
these connections seem to only be mentioned "in passing" in the literature
for the southeastern U.S.
>  
> I work as an archaeologist at Fort Polk in west-central Louisiana.  We
have noticed over the years that many historic sites (as indicated from
historic aerials and other documentation) were missed during previous
surveys.  I am currently writing an article discussing the reasons behind
these sites being "overlooked", which will have a section specifically on
vegetation that will largely be written by the installation botanist.  He is
very knowledgable on the subject, but I'm trying to help him find any
previous work done for the area or comparable resources.  We would like to,
as was mentioned in one of the previous emails, develop a list of
trees/shrubs/plants that almost certainly indicate a homestead (due to them
having to be planted and/or not spreading heavily) as well as a list of
those that are suspicious enough to justify surveyors briefly veering from
their transects to further investigate.  This will help ensure that future
surveyors
> can be briefed beforehand with respect to types of vegetation to "be on
the lookout for".
>  
> Many thanks,
> Brad Laffitte
> 
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2