I also tend to think of a midden as something that gradually accumulates as a result of disposal activities over time, while a dump may represent a discrete occurrence of disposal, often of just a few classes of artifacts (bottles, broken dishes). A dump may also be located at some distance from the place of residence, or deposited in a specific landform, such as a ravine, whereas I tend to think of a midden as something that would likely be found around a domestic structure, such as a kitchen. I also think that using a term that a historical occupant or producer of such a deposit would use might be a good approach to consider.


Andrew R. Sewell, MS, RPA
Principal Investigator
Hardlines Design Company
 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeanette Mckenna
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 1:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: terminology

I tend to think of "midden" and household or more organic waste, while
trash dump or refuse may include many other items - like industrial waste,
metals, etc.

Jeanette McKenna
California


> [Original Message]
> From: Chuck Carrig <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 5/11/2010 10:53:55 AM
> Subject: terminology
>
> Is there a consensus on the proper terminology for the discussion of
> historic refuse concentrations?
>
> I've always used the terminology historic midden as opposed to historic
> trash dump.
>
> Chuck Carrig - RPA
> Archaeologist
> BLM - Dillon Field Office
> 1005 Selway Drive
> Dillon, MT 59725
> (406)683-8029