HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeanette Mckenna <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 11 May 2010 10:57:15 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
I tend to think of "midden" and household or more organic waste, while
trash dump or refuse may include many other items - like industrial waste,
metals, etc.

Jeanette McKenna
California


> [Original Message]
> From: Chuck Carrig <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 5/11/2010 10:53:55 AM
> Subject: terminology
>
> Is there a consensus on the proper terminology for the discussion of
> historic refuse concentrations?
>
> I've always used the terminology historic midden as opposed to historic
> trash dump.
>
> Chuck Carrig - RPA
> Archaeologist
> BLM - Dillon Field Office
> 1005 Selway Drive
> Dillon, MT 59725
> (406)683-8029

ATOM RSS1 RSS2