HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jorge Garcia-Herreros <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:14:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (113 lines)
 Anita,



I have to say that HISTARCH has been an invaluable tool, as many colleagues have already stated.? You have contributed to the field of Historical Archaeology greatly by running and maintaining this list.? Please do not stop running HISTARCH, although you might not heard it often enough your efforts are greatly appreciated.



Regarding the Marco Polo question, I saw part of that movie and I did stop watching when I notice some mayor inconsistencies.? Ms. Street's had validity in asking the question since we must understand that the list is an "open" forum in which, vocational archaeologist and the general public might join.? Having said that, it is also appropriate to politely correct an individual as to what is the main topic of the forum.

Best regards to all,
Jorge



-- 

Jorge Garcia-Herreros, RPA, CRD

Gulf Coast Archaeology Group, LLP

Cultural Resources Director

Phone 713-703-9252 

Fax 281-897-9699? 



 [log in to unmask]





 



-----Original Message-----

From: Anita Cohen-Williams <[log in to unmask]>

To: [log in to unmask]

Sent: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 5:51 pm

Subject: Should HISTARCH continue?













Considering all the discussion around whether or not Marco Polo should

be included in a discussion of Historical Archaeology (i.e.

archaeology of the modern world, 1400 forward), I am wondering if I

should continue running HISTARCH.



I have been running this discussion list alone since 1994 without pay

from any source, as a labor of love. I am not a professor nor

librarian in any university, the SHA does not pay me (although they do

use this forum), and I am not an employee of any governmental agency.

Nor am I paid to run ArchaeoSeek, although several people have stepped

up and donated monies for the $20 a month that it costs.



In light of that, and the fact that, while I do keep an eye on the

discussions and attempt to keep them on topic, this list is NOT

moderated nor censored. Considering the current tone of this latest

discussion, I am wondering if it all was a waste.



-- 

Anita Cohen-Williams

Organic SEO and Social Media Marketing

http://www.mysearchguru.com

Twitter: @searchguru

Listowner of HISTARCH





 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2