BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Wed, 21 May 2008 08:21:58 -0700
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
> if formic acid treatments in pad and/or dribbling makes pollen worthless

Could anyone please post data to support this claim?
This is a substantial accusation against formic acid.
DeKnow's kitchen experiment did not contain pollen, so cannot be
extrapolated to infer anything about the effect of formic acid on cells of
stored pollen in the combs.

May we see the details of any experiment that found that formic vapor
stopped the natural lactic acid fermentation of pollen?

I have used MiteAwayII a few times, and have read a number of papers on its
effects upon bees and varroa.  I have not observed or come across any
observations by others that it had a negative effect upon bee nutrition.

If this claim of pollen sterilization is to be made publicly, it should be
supported by good data.  Not all beekeepers are willing to let their
mite-infested colonies die, and seek safe, legal treatments.  MiteAwayII
appears to be an environmentally-benign product that leaves no residue.  I
would not want to see its reputation tainted by unfounded claims.

Randy Oliver

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2