Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:50:40 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Here is a good one for debate. Since there are no historical renderings of the San Diego Presidio superstructure and the site exists entirely as a subsurface entity of foundations, low wall stubs and floors, I am not sure that a rebuilding could be accomplished that meets the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Reconstruction. It would be a stretch, even if these presidios were built along standard plans. Also, any reconstruction would have a substantial impact on the archaeological remains. A virtual reconstruction seems to be the most preservation-sensitive approach, as Williams has done with his "fly-through" computer simulation. There had been previous calls for reconstructing the presidio during Williams dig and I have yet to be convinced it is a good idea.
Jerry Schaefer
ASM Affiliates, Inc.
2034 Corte Del Nogal
Carlsbad, CA 92011
Phone: (760) 804-5757
Fax: (760) 804-5755
-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
[log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2008 2:51 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Presidio de San Diego
This is great news! Hope it stimulates a lot of interest in finishing the
archaeology and then reconstructing. Of the four presidios in Alta
California, San Francisco and Monterey are largely destroyed and excavation would
intrude on later occupation (also historical). Santa Barbara is partially
preserved and partially disturbed by later building. It is also located in one of
the most expensive real estate areas of the state. You guys have the best
chance for a complete presidio!
Good luck.
Bob Hoover
**************
Looking for simple solutions to your real-life
financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips
and calculators.
(http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)
|
|
|