Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:41:57 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Juanse said: I am sure we can develop
> bees more resistant to nosema but for this, as with varroa, we need to
> stop
> treatments for a while (accepting loosing some or lots of colonies) for
> selecting the resistant stock for further multiplication.
Hi Juanse. I was thinking of you today--enjoying the beginning of summer as
the weather turns cold in my hemisphere!
This is a common misconception--that it is necessary to let colonies die in
order to develop resistance to a pest.
In my own operation, I try not to let any colonies die. I do kill a lot of
queens though, since what I want to die out is poor genes, not the bees
themselves, since they die on an individual basis soon enough.
The point is, you can screen for resistance by letting nonresistant colonies
die, OR you can screen for resistance by another method (e.g., stickyboards,
microscopy), then breed only from those showing resistance. Keep the best
bees isolated as best you can in breeding areas, and run the rest for
production (with appropriate treatments) to make a living. Each spring,
replace all nonresistant queens with resistant queens.
A beekeeper who is not making a living cannot well further stock
improvement! As Bob Harrison has pointed out, you need to breed from good
producers to stay in business. Breed for any other trait secondarily
(unless you are a researcher, who enjoys the luxury of getting paid while
accepting such losses in the search of promising genes, as John Harbo did
for SMR).
Randy
******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm *
******************************************************
|
|
|