Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:57:45 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> James Fisher wrote:
>
> >What has happened over and over is that the European "Precautionary
> >Principle" is used to temporarily suspend use of specific chemicals,
> >but things do NOT improve, so the suspensions are lifted. Yet people
> >with agendas cite these uses of the "Precautionary Principle" as if
> >they were "proof" of something, rather than what they are, which is a
> >preemptive suspension, specifically taken in the
> ABSENCE of proof.
> >(Why do you think they call it the "PRECAUTIONARY Principle", for
> >Pete's sake?)
>
James,
Would you explain what you mean with 'people with agendas'?
Who are they?
What's their goal?
Why do they what they do?
You wrote this earlier, so it's good to be clear about it.
Kind regards,
Ghislain De Roeck.
****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm *
****************************************************
|
|
|