Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:00:58 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Iain,
Eleanor Conlin Casella and I have recently explored this issue in our edited
Springer volume Industrial Archaeology:New Directions. The volume argues for a
social archaeology of industrialization. A common theme in this volume is that
that the physical recording of machines and industrial processes is not
enough.
james
Quoting Iain Stuart <[log in to unmask]>:
> Industrial Archaeology vs. Industrial Heritage
>
> Anyone noticed how we are loosing industrial archaeology to the grab bag
> term “heritage”? Any idea why?
>
> I seem to recall that when it was discovered that industrial archaeologists
> were found to be doing history, archaeology, engineering etc it was deemed
> that it must be “heritage “ rather than “archaeology” But don’t historical
> archaeologist do much the same thing??
>
> Is it important that we keep the term industrial archaeology?
>
> Yours,
>
>
>
> Dr Iain Stuart
>
> JCIS Consultants
>
> P.O. Box 2397
>
> Burwood North,
>
> NSW 2124
>
>
>
> ph/fx (02) 97010191
>
>
>
> HYPERLINK "mailto:[log in to unmask]"[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> HYPERLINK "mailto:[log in to unmask]"[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> See our web page at HYPERLINK "http://www.jcis.net.au"www.jcis.net.au
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/457 - Release Date: 26/09/2006
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/457 - Release Date: 26/09/2006
>
>
James Symonds
Director
Archaeological Research & Consultancy at the Univeristy of Sheffield
West Court
2 Mappin Street
Sheffield S1 4DT
UK
Tel: ++44 (0)114 222 5106
Fax: ++44 (0)114 2797158
www.sheffield.ac.uk/arcus
|
|
|