Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Newberry's Quartet in D
From:
Denis Fodor <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:45:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Stirling Newberry, working very hard to rebut some observations made by
Denis Fodor concerning his lyrics, writes:

>But it is also the artist's right to demur and ask "is this really just
>and sufficent ground to reject the work? Because it makes - of all things
>- uncomfortable with its methods?"

The right's acknowledged.  But it has nothing to do with this case.
Reject the work? I did nothing of the kind.  I confined myself to (a)
saying the music was fine, and (b) objecting to the deliberate misspelling
of two key words because the result was infelicitous.  There was no
objection to quite a number of things that Mr. Newberry misconstrued as
objections--for instance his scheme of meter.  I wouldn't object to that
because observation of meter in blank verse is worth striving for--though
hellishly hard to make sound facile.  Please be assured that I wish our
poet/composers godspeed.

Denis Fodor                     Internety:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV