BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Robert Brenchley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:54:12 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
 
In a message dated 15/10/2007 14:07:40 GMT Standard Time,  da
[log in to unmask] writes:

<<Likewise I was not there, but I do wonder how much the change  was 
influenced by a few 'well known' and possibly over persuasive  
individuals that were revered at the  time.>>



I also wonder whether Amm genes were really  eliminated, given that they 
appear to have been well established by the  Victorian era. I always suspect that 
what you really have over there is a  variable hybrid which includes a good 
bit of Amm. For all their efforts at  breeding Carniolans, the Germans never 
eliminated the influence of the native  bee, and their work was far more 
intensive than anything I've heard of in the  States.  

Regards,

Robert Brenchley,
Birmingham  UK




   

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2