Hi Peter

> when you get a match or near match, what you'll
> end up with is a probability that some hypothesis is true, not a guarantee.

Obtaining the matches would only be a starting point for further 
checking, I am not expecting perfection and would always prefer 'real 
data', but where data is not existing or is expensive to gather there 
may be room for a synthetic approach.

>  Computing or estimating the probabilities could be tricky.

The modelling would have to be based on what we already know.

What I am suggesting does not synthesize 'answers' only large quantities 
of arbitrary sets of data, once a match is found, a human must interpret 
the data to establish the answers.

-- 
Regards & Best 73s, Dave Cushman, G8MZY
http://melliferabees.net Email: [log in to unmask]
Short FallBack M/c, Build 7.21/2.01
Son of ORAC M/c, Build 5.o1/2.o1

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************