Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - HISTARCH Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
HISTARCH Home HISTARCH Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: scholarly standards
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:53:42 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Well... sort of thought the same of Foucault, really. Especially considering how some of the people who used to praise Foucault have now jumped on the Heidegger bandwagon.
Heidegger, of course, is even difficult in German. The English translations are supposedly bad...
I'd just basically be happy if people could document their sites well without getting too wrapped up in their phenomenological experience, and if they could write clear, objective prose instead of bad poetry.

-----Original Message-----

Not to be trying to revert back to the days of "I only move dirt," but doesn't
it strike you as sad that archaeologists are citing Heidegger and Husserl?
Now, McTaggart, I can see going to him ....

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV