Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 22 May 2008 22:06:18 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Patricia,
The best British ceramics were retained for local markets and the cheap mass
produced were used for trade. Out along the western Pacific Coast, who would
know good from cheap ceramics? But even the Mexican factories practiced this
distinction and shipped the "amarillo" or common tin-glaze wares to distant
colonies. Way out here in 19th century Mexican California, most of the early
British ceramics were either un-marked or factory seconds.
Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.
In a message dated 5/22/2008 12:12:19 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Hi,
I need some help with some English XIXth century wares coming from
archaeologycal excavations in Buenos Aires, Argentine. I have noticed that most of
the objets do not have marks; Creamware, Pearlware, Whiteware, etc.. Anybody
knows why?. I suppose that little factorys or second class production arrived
at this far away city. If so, I would need bibliografy to justfy. Surely,
there had been a lot of reasons why this happened.
Thank you very much for any help!
Patricia Frazzi (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
[log in to unmask]
**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with
Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
|
|
|