Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:55:54 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
i'm sure we'll be able to read it all or recover it from crashes with
mirrored back ups. Just ask the White House about emails.
Tim
On Nov 13, 2007, at 8:51 PM, Bob Skiles wrote:
>>
>> But 15 years later, British officials found the information on the
>> discs was practically inaccessible - not because the discs were
>> corrupted, but because they were no longer compatible with modern
>> computer systems. By contrast, the original Domesday Book, written
>> on parchment in 1086, is still in readable condition in England's
>> National Archives in Kew. (The multimedia version was ultimately
>> salvaged.) "
>>
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4201645.html
>
> The author apparently confuses the difference between legible and
> readable. Even though the origininal Domesday Book is very well
> preserved and perfectly "legible" he fails to mention that, it too,
> is "practically inaccessible" ... as it is written in Latin and in
> an ofttimes confusing format, and for all practical purposes of the
> average person "reading" or accessing the data, it's just as
> inaccessible as the obsolete laser discs became.
> "Although unique in character and invaluable to the student,
> scholars are unable to explain portions of its language and of its
> system. This is partly due to its very early date, which has placed
> a gulf between Domesday Book and later records which is difficult
> to bridge." - from wikipedia entry
Timothy Scarlett
Assistant Professor of Archaeology
Department of Social Sciences/AOB 209
Michigan Technological University
1400 Townsend Ave.
Houghton, MI 49931
[log in to unmask]
(906)487-2359 (office)
(906)487-2468 (fax)
------------------------
|
|
|