HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:48:54 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
i was wondering about that, too...
maybe there is some kind of assumption that they were rich & powerful enough 
that nobody noticed, or cared...?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mary C. Beaudry" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Medieval women 'had girl power'


> Re these medieval gals:  someone please explain to me how being widowed at
> age 30 rendered one incapable of becoming pregnant and hence able to "be
> more sexually liberated as there would be no child as evidence of their
> fornication or adultery."  Huh? 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2