HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:46:23 EDT
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: recording evidence of post-depositional transformations
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
From:
Ron May <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
 
In a message dated 8/24/2007 12:08:33 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

One  thing I learned from Binford, which Schiffer denied (may still for all I 
know)  -- witness the "Pompeii premise" controversy, is that Binford and 
those  following were also very concerned about site formation processes; it was 
not  an issue exclusive to the law-abiding  Schifferians.



Could you explain this better? I find this a bit too cryptic for my  
understanding.
 
Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.



************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

ATOM RSS1 RSS2