HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Parkhill <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:12:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
I heartily endorse a fume hood in any lab where potential toxic or 
foul smells are likely. Having taught chemistry and biology in High 
School and worked closely with animals in college ( not the student 
type) vent hoods were SOP. It never pays to exercise a little caution 
where potential health matters may be cause for worry.

DP


At 01:06 PM 4/9/2009, you wrote:
>Hello Listers -
>
>
>
>I am looking for experiences, anecdotes, opinions about the necessity of
>a fume hood in an archaeology laboratory setup. The laboratory in
>question will have a general exhaust fan as well as Nederman extraction
>trunks for targeted fume removal. A fume hood is also planned, but I'm
>beginning to think it may be redundant. Some conservation entailing the
>use of chemicals will occur in the laboratory, but that is not the
>primary purpose/intended use of the space. (The lab supports a resource
>management and research-based government archaeology program.)
>
>
>
>Thanks for your consideration -
>
>aloha
>
>~liz
>
>
>
>Liz Clevenger, MA, RPA
>
>Curator of Archaeology
>
>The Presidio Trust
>
>(415) 561-5086 office
>
>(415) 561-5089 fax
>
>[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
>
>
>Presidio Archaeology Lab
>
>(415) 561-ARCH
>
>www.presidio.gov/history/archaeology
><http://www.presidio.gov/history/archaeology>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2