BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Cushman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:53:58 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hi Peter

> Right, but I just don't know if the measurements made by a trained scientist
> and those made by the average beekeeper would be of comparable accuracy. I
> know Tom Seeley and he is one of the most meticulous persons I have ever met.

A scientist, generally is not trained in metrology and is unlikely to be 
more able or better equipped than someone who is. I do not know Deniss' 
training, but my figures were also included in the post that Peter is 
trying to find a reason for not accepting.

My figures came from methods and skill that would be hard to find among 
non-engineering personnel, using equipment that is calibrated and itself 
scrutinised to a high degree.

However you do not need to take my word for it, the plaster plugs from 
Chris' original piece of comb still exist and can be re-measured if 
there is any question about the accuracy of the original work.

Can you revisit the measuring of Tom Seeley, that you are defending so 
strongly ?


Regards & Best 73s, Dave Cushman, G8MZY
http://website.lineone.net/~dave.cushman or http://www.dave-cushman.net
Short FallBack M/c, Build 6.02/3.1 (stable)

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2