My point being...our company probably cares more about 'properly'
curating collections than Most I have heard about (or seen). 

I cant answer for management...since I am not one.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
>Behalf Of Ron May
>Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 12:30 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Management Interference in Standard Archaeology Procedures
>
> 
>In a message dated 8/3/2007 11:16:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight 
>Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
>
>While I  understand you were supporting My side Ron...our 
>company would NEVER sell  bottles...or get rid of any 
>collections.  Please don't make such  suggestions. 
>
>
>
>Ok, I accept your statement that the collection from this 
>nationally significant site will be preserved in perpetuity 
>and that no artifacts will be  sold or discarded. I wrote 
>"tongue-in-cheek" and in anger over what I perceived  to be a 
>threat to what had been a completely protected site. But will 
>management  honor your promise that none of the collection 
>will be discarded before it gets  to the San Diego 
>Archaeological Center? What about culling and the practice of  
>discarding common things? 
> 
>Moreover, the fate of this collection has nothing to do with 
>the hundreds  of collections your company has curated in the 
>past. I see no reason for bringing up all the other 
>collections in this context.
> 
>Ron May
>Legacy 106, Inc.
>
>
>
>************************************** Get a sneak peek of the 
>all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
>