Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 13 Apr 1999 09:32:13 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mark Shanks wrote:
>Don't care for opera, either?
Opera is often a collaborative effort. These days it is rare to find a
producer or director willing to extend a shot to allow for the end of a
musical phrase.
>However, in films, the score (I believe) makes some attempt at overcoming
>the limitations of the literal interpretation by connecting to an emotional
>level purely visual imagery can't reach.
I wonder how many visual artists would agree with that?
>What would "Psycho" be without Hermann's score?
That is a very interesting question. I would love to see it that way.
Herrmann usually was part of the process when working on a film. I don't
in any way slight his enormous contribution to any film he worked on, nor
am I suggesting that the use of music in a film diminishes its impact,
but I do believe that a play, without any music, well done, can keep our
attention. I wonder why this is so and why film seems to "need" music.
>If you are "too aware" of the effect the music has on your perception of
>the image, you have disassembled the goose while looking for golden eggs.
>Unfortunately, you may never make it back into fairy-land.
Which explains why I have a collection of over 1,000 soundtracks and
almost never go to the movies!
Karl
|
|
|