HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 10:54:28 -0700
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject:
Re: Bottle ID help - eBay bottle example
From:
Joe Dent <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Mime-version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
on 10/9/07 12:29 AM, Ron May at [log in to unmask] wrote:

> No, but there was an article in a national magazine a few years ago  claiming
> the Sandia points were really Solutrean points salted in the  site.
> 
> Ron May
> Legacy 106, Inc.
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
Ron, et al. -  Those questionable Sandia points are linked to well known
(and now late) SW archaeologist, Frank Hibben. He is often affectionately
remembered in the region today as "Fibbin Hibben."  I also know for a fact
that he did not spread Gulden's mustard on his sandwich, so historical
archaeology remains safe from him.

J. Dent
American University

ATOM RSS1 RSS2