HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Pentney, Sandra" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:57:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
But what about wind farms and transmission? 

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gwyn
Alcock
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: National Landscape Conservation Act

Well, from what I've seen, "solar farm" and "landscape conservation"
have nothing to do with each other.

Pretty hard to mow under solar panels, so it's pretty much
scorched-earth policy under there.

Gwyn Alcock
Riverside, California





________________________________
From: Sandra Pentney <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:20:53 AM
Subject: National Landscape Conservation Act

I am interested to see what impact on cultural resources the National
Landscape Conservation Act and the Omnibus Public Lands Management Act
will have.
Will there be tighter preservation of cultural resources? The one thing
that occurred to me is that there might be a greater call for viewshed
analysis to determine the impact of visual obstructions to these
preserved areas.
How does this new Act coincide with Obama's renewable energy mandate?

Does anyone have any information or comments on this?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2