HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mary C. Beaudry" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:48:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
>
> >>> Hmm, way back in the 70s wasn't there some sort of debate about this
> that went, essentially, "Its all archaeology, and we shouldn't arbitrarily
> separate historic from prehistoric"? That Binford guy maybe?
> Carl
>

Perhaps, but why would anyone be paying attention to Binford?

Seriously, though, point taken.  But in a real world context, we cannot be
experts in all things, and in Massachusetts, at least, someone with my
training and skill sets would not be able to get a permit to excavate a
prehistoric site because I lack the necessary experience and expertise (and
hence don't meet the Sec of Interior guidelines mirrored in state law).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2