The federal system classifies the location data as
"Confidential" and many states do as well (here in New
Mexico for instance). The actual report data, other
than locations, is public domain. So, a report's
results, site descriptions, methods, analysis, and
interpretations are all public information.
--- JAMES MURPHY <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> In Ohio, the "grey literature" for the most part is
> not regarded as public documents. A SHPO employee
> has written "... these technical reports are not
> available to the general public... these reports are
> not meant or written for the general public. They
> are technical reports written and largely paid for
> by private industry, and reviewed by government
> agencies with jurisdiction over a project." The
> reports "are available to those who have a
> legitimate need for the information they contain."
>
> While I do not know of anyone who has been refused
> access to a report, this "need-to-know" criterion
> has created considerable antagonism among the
> non-professional archaeological community.
>
> In 1985 I compiled a bibliography of Ohio contract
> archaeology for the Ohio SHPO but that is no longer
> available and has never been updated. Instead,
> there has been development of a very useful on-line
> site database, but it is subscription-only and at
> this point is limited to academics and CRM workers.
> There is much talk about "public outreach" but for
> the general public this has largely been limited to
> non-professionals providing volunteer labor and site
> information. Except for a few stray reports that
> have found their way into public libraries, I do not
> know of any public bibliographic access(other than
> the NADB database, which is not current and is not
> familiar to the general public).
>
> Jim Murphy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Smoke <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Monday, March 26, 2007 2:52 pm
> Subject: Re: Creating Access and Syntheses
>
> > Anita: The USDA Forest Service Heritage data for
> sites and surveys is
> > being put into a web-based system called INFRA.
> Lots of security
> > levels and we can only see the stuff from our own
> Forest and can not
> > even see the stuff from another Forest in the same
> state. As far
> > as I
> > can tell so far, its only real use is that it was
> developed for number
> > crunching for upward reporting. Has not helped us
> on-the-ground
> > worker-ants even a little bit.
> >
> > :-(
> >
> > Smoke
> >
> >
> > On 3/26/07, Anita Cohen-Williams
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > I have often batted the idea around about doing
> an archaeological
> > > clearinghouse for gray literature, based on the
> model of ERIC
> > > (Educational Resources Information
> Clearinghouse).
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, ERIC (which stored information at
> specific
> > > institutions), collapsed as soon as government
> funding ran out.
> > >
> > > However, with the advent of CD-ROMs, and new
> ways of storing
> > data, it
> > > may be possible to revisit the idea.
> > >
> > > What if every CRM agency sent a copy of their
> reports to one central
> > > location, with the purpose of that information
> being scanned and
> > > placed on CDs (or DVDs) for further storage? The
> data could be
> > kept in
> > > categories for easy retrieval.
> > >
> > > At least we could keep up with the current
> information, and try
> > to go
> > > back and retrieve older information.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, I have found that older reports
> often disappear from
> > > state repositories and archaeological
> facilities.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Anita Cohen-Williams
> > > ArchaeoSeek
> > > http://archaeoseek.ning.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Smoke Pfeiffer
> >
> > Absence of Evidence is NOT Evidence of Absence
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
|
