Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:08:55 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>> Cane is now advising almond growers on how to have
>> "a more balanced portfolio of pollinators"
randy oliver wrote:
> Not likely, with the total absence of other flowering plants in
> and around the almond orchard.
Bill Truesdell wrote:
> Even worse than that. Check the economics to have the
> numbers needed to do the job and how to get those numbers
> from native pollinators.
> It all gets down to two simple facts that are omitted from any NP
> information. Numbers and transportable. Honeybees can supply
> both and the NP neither for large scale agriculture
Randy & Bill, when the NP people talk to reporters, they make
it sound like wild native bees could deliver a comparable degree of
pollination if farmers supplied them with "flowering hedgerows,
fallow land and crop diversification."
Example: In a July 15 Seattle Times newspaper article,
http://tinyurl.com/ys3fbw Scott Black, executive director
of the Xerces Society told the reporter:
"hundreds of species of native bees are available for crop
pollination if only their habitat were properly managed. That
means flowering hedgerows, fallow land, crop diversification."
"Using a variety of bees for pollination means less threat to
the food supply from a single mite, parasite or disease. "We
need to diversify our portfolio of pollinators," Black says.
Paul Cherubini
El Dorado, Calif.
******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm *
******************************************************
|
|
|