Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 1 May 2007 10:21:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Of course I forgot to include beekeepers who are running the Russian bee
in my latest list. As I understand it, many are able to run these bees
without much, if any, treatment.
And, of course, I forgot about those who are using non-contaminating
chemicals like formic and oxalic. Since we are talking about the days
when things were simpler and combs from the brood boxes could be
interchanged with the super combs without worry, I suppose they qualify in
that regard, if not in the rest of the criteria.
As for going back to the carefree days when we didn't have the expense and
inconvenience of having to schedule around treatments or monitor for
tracheal and varroa mites -- in addition to having to worry about comb
contamination -- in North America, I don't think many commercial
beekeepers are anywhere near there yet.
******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm *
******************************************************
|
|
|