Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 10 Sep 2006 08:35:44 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<000c01c6d482$98ba9700$0400a8c0@workstation> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Content-disposition: |
inline |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>It
> effects nutrition by broadening available floral sources. This in turn
> effects environment again, because flora not previously taking
> advantageof a larger array of bee visitation are now being
> pollinated more
> regularly and so the environment develops which further increases
> nutrition again.
MMmm - some pretty interesting logic there. Got any data? Like,
floral surveys of an area before and after small cell use? Or is this
simply an assumption? I am not saying that this doesn’t reflect what
is going on, what I want to know is if you know this, or just *think*
this.
>When mites are present in small cell
> workerbrood cells, small cell worker bees will open the cell, and
> kill the
> mites (and the bee pupae as a result). This is the beginning of the
> genetic pie. Not all queen lines will do this and so they will not
> be as
Mmm - my understanding from what Dennis writes about his experience is
that all bees he tried seem to do better on small cell. Not just
certain lines. Maybe I am wrong he can certainly speak for himself,
though I know he is currently apostate with regards to the small cell
group.
> It's a "whole" beekeeping ideology and method,
I think it's the idealogy part that trips some folks up. Makes it
sound like a religion.
Keith
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|