HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Doms, Keith" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:27:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
According to George Miller

Muffins: 		3-7 inches
Twiffler:		8 inches
Dinner Plate:	9 inches or greater
Platters:		Are elongated

The above mentioned sizes become standardized along with prices in the
late 18th to early 19th C.  They are eluded to in Miller's "War and
Pots" in Ceramics in America in America 2008. 

George should be able to give you more references.

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Terry Majewski
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Twifflers, etc.

George Miller should weigh in on this.

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mark
Branstner
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 8:46 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Twifflers, etc.

Hey Guys

Hist Arch 101 question, so please bear with me ...

Are there REALLY standardized dimensions (i.e., six inch vs. 7-inch 
or whatever) for dinnerware vessel forms, e.g., table plates, supper 
plates, twifflers, and muffins, etc.  Do these descriptors apply to 
1820-1860 assemblages? And can somebody give me a readily accessible 
reference to where this is laid out?

Thanks in advance.

Mark
-- 

Mark C. Branstner, RPA
Historic Archaeologist

Illinois State Archaeological Survey
Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
209 Nuclear Physics Lab, MC-571
23 East Stadium Drive
Champaign, IL 61820

Phone: 217.244.0892
Fax: 217.244.7458
Cell: 517.927.4556
[log in to unmask]


"There's absolutely nothing wrong with Marxism, so long as you stop 
at "A Day At The Races." If you keep on with "At the Circus," etc., 
suddenly, Marxism doesn't seem all that interesting and you start to 
look for something a bit more competent, like Chaplinism or 
Stoogeism"  - Anonymous

"I hope there's pudding" - Luna Lovegood (HP5)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2