Doug,
My recent dissertation through Syracuse University among other
things, looks at the issue of mismatched transferprint sets at
Hudson's Bay Company Fort Vancouver (ca. 1829-1860). Specifically, I
compared archaeological ceramic assemblages from "Gentleman" class
households segregated within the fort, versus "Servant" class
households segregated outside of the fort.
Cromwell, Robert J.
2006 "Where Ornament and Function are so Agreeably Combined":
Consumer Choice Studies of English Ceramic Wares at Hudson's Bay
Company Fort Vancouver. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse
University, Syracuse, New York.
Best,
Bob Cromwell, Ph.D.
Archaeologist
Fort Vancouver National Historic Site
612 E. Reserve St.
Vancouver, WA 98661
On Jan 19, 2008, at 11:10 AM, George L. Miller wrote:
> Doug,
>
> A couple of my articles have dealt with the matching of
> ceramics,
> particularly tea to tablewares. You might want look at the following.
>
> George L. Miller
> 1984 George M. Coates, Pottery Merchant of Philadelphia, 1817-1831.
> Winterthur Portfolio Vol. 19, No. 1 pages37-49.
>
> George L. Miller, Ann Smart Martin and Nancy S. Dickinson
> 1994 Changing Consumption Patterns, English Ceramics and the American
> Market from 1770 to 1840.
>
> George L. Miller and Amy C. Earls
> 2008 War and Pots: The Impact of Economics and Politics on Ceramic
> Consumption Patterns. This paper is being published in the 2008
> volume of Ceramics in America edited by Robert Hunter.
>
> The last two papers show how teas and tablewares were quite
> separate
> wares in terms of their decoration and purchase patterns.
>
> Peace,
> George L. Miller
> URS Corporation
> 437 High Street
> Burlington, New Jersey 08016
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you receive this
> message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should not
> retain,
> distribute, disclose or use any of this information and you should
> destroy
> the e-mail and any attachments or copies.
>
>
>
>
|
