Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Mon, 5 Apr 1999 11:08:10 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Don Satz writes:
>We have many different types of contemporary classical music to choose
>from - some like Varese, others like Part/Tavener, while others like Tan
>Dun or Danielpour. There's no need to "dump" on those composers you don't
>like and attribute "damages" to them.
Agreed. But to listeners, like myself, who are in CM almost exclusively
for its Romantic period (and, to a certain extent,that which preceded it)
there's a factor that does come into play. Personally I prefer my music
live and when I go to a concert I rate highly a program that sticks to what
I'm seeking. The inclusion in a program of bits by,say, Varese or Tan Dun
I sense as an intrusion. (Part is to me much less of a problem.) And, as
my taste tends toward the orthodox, there's just so much mixture with the
deliberately unorthodox that I'll gladly abide. Beyond that certain
measure, there lies for me promiscuity. (In contrast, avant-garde art
music served up heteronomously, as in ballet or in movies, often delights
me. So it goes.)
Denis Fodor Internet:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|