Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:47:05 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This is worth more than .02 since
I paid $3 for 'slicing'
I'll assume that BP is competent since OMAF paid
her for testing (TM) all last year
For me Apr 18 was first pollen, a warm day
and I inspected all hives (left)
The second round thru and I noted a lot
of 'hoppers' in front of one of the nucs
(and only one hive & BTW this nuc too was 'touched' by a skunk)
(hopper = a living bee that cannot fly, not just catching its breath)
30 -40 for each of 2 days so I put
a small formic pad on friday evening
There were NO hoppers the next day -- none!!
So my opinon was that CCD was TM -- but not now
The sample was only hoppers (27)
0 DWV, 0 young bees, no obvious old bees (frayed wings,hairless,etc)
14/27 had TM, 7/27 severe TM
So the questions are:
Why did the 13 that did NOT have TM become hoppers?
Why did formic make such a dramatic improvement?
Is my intuition about skunks bogus?
damn I dislike formic
dave
******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm *
******************************************************
|
|
|