While I understand you were supporting My side Ron...our company would
NEVER sell bottles...or get rid of any collections.  Please don't make
such suggestions. 
 
We probably have curated MORE (currently produced, not old 'orphans')
collections since 2000 than any CRM company in this large County.  Our
collections get curated immediately upon completing the report.  Most
companies have a 2-4 yr lag time before they ever turn in their
collections to the curation facility.  And, I don't think there are even
curation facilities in many parts of the U.S.  ???

Numerous artifacts from several of our past collections are currently on
display at the curation Center.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
>Behalf Of Ron May
>Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 2:49 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Management Interference in Standard Archaeology Procedures
>
> 
>In a message dated 8/2/2007 6:14:18 P.M. Pacific Daylight 
>Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
>
>"....but  why over run the budget (and probably schedule too) 
>at the expense of  generating a top notch technical report..."
>
>
>Carol did not run over budget. The PI cut her funding in half. 
>Why? I  assume 
>to show more income to the firm. Why? For advancement, I would 
>assume. I  
>expect the next cost-cutting device will be to toss the 
>collection out in the  
>dumpster or sell the whole bottles on Ebay, just to recoup a 
>few more sheckles  
>for the bottomline. But no, Carol is not the problem here.
> 
>Ron May
>Legacy 106, Inc.
>
>
>
>************************************** Get a sneak peek of the 
>all-new AOL at 
>http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
>