I am trying my best to understand all of the evaluations concerning the
terms "Historical Archaeology", "History"and "Archaeology". The more I
read, (it is all very good!) the more confused I become.
It seems to me some folks are trying to defend their "Sacred Positions",
which I find is usual among intellectuals, while others are trying to just
confuse the issue. Being a neophyte in this area of study I keep asking,
Huh? So if I may be so bold as to admit, "I don't know!" Then "What the
heck is Historical Archaeology ?"
With all due respect, I am really impressed with the quality and knowledge
of all of you and your willingness to share and support each other.
Best regards