HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:13:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
 
In a message dated 7/17/2007 1:45:29 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

However,  Ron O'l Chap, I do share and heartily second your views that HA
should be  an interdisciplinary field where the two disciplines are  really
melded.  I see very little of that, and I don't see how it can  happen in
the one-dimensional approach the current training and practice in  HA takes.

Yo, ho.



Carl,
 
I think you confuse prehistoric archaeologists (anthropology  trained) 
playing at historical archaeology for contract money. When  they cannot find 
teaching jobs, most find engineering firms that do not  know the difference between 
an ethnologist or a biological  anthropologist from a prehistorian, let alone a 
trained historical  archaeologist. And few of either know much about 
conservation and  collections management. 
 
Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.



************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

ATOM RSS1 RSS2