Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:58:43 -0400 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<000e01c78601$25157140$1abc59d8@BusyBeeAcres> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> In Europe you mostly run dark races which had been exposed to TM. In the
> U.S. we mostly run Italian bees which in the 80's had NEVER seen a TM. My
> Italian bees have always had problems dealing with TM. Treatment once a
> year costs around fifty cents plus labor. Left untreated for a couple years
> they start crashing in winter. I would rather use my high production Italian
> bees and treat than use so called TM resistant strains I have tried.
Isn't this backwards? I read:
> Soon after Br. Adam joined Brother Columban, thirty out of the Abbey's forty-six colonies were wiped out by a disease known as Acarine. All of the bees that died were of the native British black bee variety. This bee was renowned for being hardy, but somewhat ill-tempered. The bees that survived the outbreak were all of Italian origin.
> In 1919, after Brother Columban retired, Brother Adam was put in charge of the bees, and he set about rebuilding the colonies. His intention was to use cross-breeding to develop a new bee which would be hardy like the black bee, but disease-resistant like the Italian bee, and a good honey producer.
http://www.buckfast.org.uk/site.php?use=bees
******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm *
******************************************************
|
|
|