HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:16:53 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 lines)
pursuant to the last query: Stukeley has a strange reference to "In Feb. 1727-28" in a letter published in Vol. 35 of the "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society" - I wasn't sure if this represented vagueness on his part about the date "they" did some plowing, or (the idea I just had) that maybe the year began sometime in the middle of February back in the 1720s...?
then i realised that Vol. 35 is dated "1727-1728," but published sometime after (i assume), so...
curioser & curioser...
anyone have any clever explanations?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2