Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 9 Sep 2007 13:12:55 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
And their website shows a skiploader dumping a whole bucket of dirt on
top of (in to) one (in 'locked' position)...and the screen remained
standing...and held a big pile of dirt in the box (obviously not how it
would be used in archy work tho).
Our company had thot about buying one to try out, after getting a flier
at the SAAs...but, hadnt acted on it. We probably should tho...since
none of us have time to make them any more.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>Behalf Of John M. Foster
>Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 9:49 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: screen vendors
>
>
>In a message dated 9/9/2007 9:45:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
>This looks like the crew person
>would have to work harder to shake out the sand, resulting in
>people wearing out faster on an 8-hour day.
>
>We've used these screens for almost a year now and they are
>much easier to use than the traditional wooden boxes. The
>great thing is that they are self-standing, the box locks in
>place, so the screener doesn't have to dump a bucket then pick
>up the screen. Nice on the back.
>
>John Foster
>
>
>
>************************************** See what's new at
>http://www.aol.com
>
|
|
|