HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 9 Sep 2007 12:55:32 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
 
In a message dated 9/9/2007 9:50:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

We've  used these screens for almost a year now and they are much easier to 
use  than the traditional wooden boxes. 


Yes, I suspect it is a matter of personal kenetics. I am impressed with the  
weight, which is less than a M-1 rifle from World War II. However, I prefer a  
long box so the sand sediments can sift out by the time the rocks, roots and  
artifacts hit the bottom of the box. Lacking a long run, the screener is 
forced  to shake the box, which results in people wearing out faster. I like the 
way  they stand up. I probably will shift to PVC, but that is my comment.
 
Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2