HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:44:28 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
I too am intrigued by the various definitions of the word "midden" among  our 
practitioners. Clearly, there are many schools of thought and teaching on  
the matter. I find myself learning more all the time, as only the day  before 
yesterday I would have considered a layer of broken things and paper to  be a 
trash layer, and not a midden. Today, I have learned  that others define "being 
knee-deep in paper  trash" as midden (a condition I often find myself when 
composing  reports). Silly me, before today, I considered decomposed organics and 
 soil to be an essential ingredient into the midden "stew" (midden,  being in 
a state or process of decay). Now I find that certain kinds  of features are 
excluded from being labeled a midden; privies, for example. I  wonder if 
"night soil" is prerequisite for distinguishing middens from  privies?
 
I look forward to the next installment of "Mysteries of the Midden."
 
Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.



************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. 
 Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2