HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Parkhill <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:54:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
May I jump in this discussion, please.

Midden, by definition is considered a dump or waste  (pit, trough, etc.)
Specific types of middens are labeled as to their purpose (kitchen 
midden, trash, burned rock) or what materials are the main 
ingredients. Privy is not considered a midden, in my opinion, but a 
privy or septic.

The flume area should, again in my opinion, be considered a feature 
or lens such as a shell lens. The discussion is interesting. I am 
curious to see the possible conclusions.

David Parkhill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2