It sounds convincing as far as the arcaeology goes, but once they start  
trying to identify 'Nmsh' with the Biblical Nimshi, a dreadful mass of  
assumptions creeps in through the window. Just because the name is to be found  in the 
text, it doesn't mean it's the same individual. For all we know to the  
contrary, the name could have been as common as Smith or Jones  today.  

Regards,

Robert Brenchley,
Birmingham  UK




   

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************