Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:22:51 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> allen dick wrote:
> (1) Parthenogenic reproduction and reproduction by thelytoky are not the
> same. etc.
Actually, I did not write that part. I relayed it.
>> And, also, many of us think that thelyoky is a useful property in bees,
>> and in no way threatening.
I wrote that part.
> For paragraph 2- is that in the US? if so, I am sincerely confused since
> it looks like both are in US bees...
AFAIK, the first is not observed in the US, the second is observed to some
extent in all honey bees.
> Thelytoky is the Cape Bee trait which we do not want in the US so why
> would it be a good thing?
We've been over all this in great detail, and it should still be in the
archives.
(The archive really should be mentioned in the BEE-L tagline, but is not).
> So what is in the Arizona bees, thelytoky or parthenogenic reproduction
> or neither?
Maybe someone would care to take this on? Again?
allen
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|