HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"paul.courtney2" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:00:41 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
1752 in UK and USA but earlier in many Catholic countries. Thus double 
dates are frequent given on edited documents e.g Jan 16 1627/8 where 
1627 is the modern calendar year. In England and its colonies calendar 
year previously began on Lady Day (March 25). Then of course there are 
accounting and regnal years..... I use the _Handbook of Dates for 
Students of English History_- must get latest edition as mine is in tatters.


paul courtney
Leicester
UK
geoff carver wrote:
> pursuant to the last query: Stukeley has a strange reference to "In Feb. 1727-28" in a letter published in Vol. 35 of the "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society" - I wasn't sure if this represented vagueness on his part about the date "they" did some plowing, or (the idea I just had) that maybe the year began sometime in the middle of February back in the 1720s...?
> then i realised that Vol. 35 is dated "1727-1728," but published sometime after (i assume), so...
> curioser & curioser...
> anyone have any clever explanations?
>   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2