HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:32:07 -0800
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Artifact ID
From:
Roderick Sprague <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
All again

After looking at the illustration with the scale, I withdraw my 
suggestion as being too long for the first-aid kit use.  Such ampules 
are only slightly longer than one inch.  Field medical use less 
complicated than Allen suggests is also a possibility.

Rick



> > [Original Message]
> > From: Carl Steen <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Date: 2/26/2008 2:01:34 PM
> > Subject: Artifact ID
> >
> > I found this item in a mid 20th century context. Any ideas? Image at:
> >
> > http://38ch69.com/What%20page.html
> >
> > Thanks
> > Carl Steen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2