HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Jul 2006 21:01:30 +0200
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines)
just an editorial, and possibly slightly off-topic (apologies!), but i was 
wondering what impact this law might have on archaeology, specifically 
historical archaeology in florida
the separation of facts from interpretation/theory sounds familiar, at any 
rate
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/02/opinion/02norton.html 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2